Presented by the Oregon bankruptcy lawyers of Baxter & Baxter, LLP
John Gallagher & Todd Duffield, of Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, consider the ruling by a California bankruptcy court that a chapter 9 debtor is not bound by the requirements of Code section 1113 or any state law in rejecting a collective bargaining agreement. The decision, however, leaves some important issues unresolved, including wh
See the original post:
In re City of Vallejo, 403 B.R. 72; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 705 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2009)
Posted in Uncategorized. Tagged with bankruptcy-court, collective-bargaining, consider-the-ruling, duffield, gallagher, hastings, important-issues, janofsky, leaves-some, llp, requirements, ruling.
To talk with an Oregon consumer protection lawyer call (503) 297-9031.
To talk with a Portland Oregon bankruptcy attorney call (503) 297-9031.
To get answers to questions about Vancouver WA Bankruptcy attorney call (360) 574-5239.
For more information about Lyndon Ruhnke, visit our website.
For more information about Lara Gardner, visit our website.
About Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 13
Common Myths about Filing for Bankruptcy in Oregon
Frequently Asked Questions about Filing for Bankruptcy in Oregon
Eliminating Second Mortgages through Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
The Process of Filing for Bankruptcy in OregonThings to Avoid before Filing Bankruptcy
Stopping Home Foreclosure through Bankruptcy
Typical Filing Fees to File for Bankruptcy in Oregon
Filing for Bankruptcy: A Fresh Start
How to Dispute False Credit Reports after Bankruptcy
Proudly powered by WordPress and Carrington.
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.